From: David Ahern
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:24:29 -0600
> On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>>> wrote:
Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
I
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 18:46:47 -0300
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:24 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>> > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Maur
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:24 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> >> wrote:
> >>> Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
> >>>
On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>> wrote:
>>> Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
>>> I'll do some research/learning on them, and give it a try for a v2.
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
>> I'll do some research/learning on them, and give it a try for a v2.
>
> FYI, that is "[PATCH v2 net-next] rtnetlink:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
wrote:
> Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
> I'll do some research/learning on them, and give it a try for a v2.
FYI, that is "[PATCH v2 net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for
ndmsg header".
BTW, could please advise whether this sho
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:01 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 10/1/18 6:44 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> >> I suspect rtnl_fdb_dump is forever stuck with the ifinfomsg struct as
> >> the header if any kernel side filtering is to be done. [snip]
> >
> > Why exactly? I understand currently t
On 10/1/18 6:44 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>> I suspect rtnl_fdb_dump is forever stuck with the ifinfomsg struct as
>> the header if any kernel side filtering is to be done. [snip]
>
> Why exactly? I understand currently there may be little information
> to distinguish family headers,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:06 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 9/28/18 1:35 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> > Currently, rtnl_fdb_dump() assumes the family header is 'struct ifinfomsg',
> > which is not always true. For example, 'struct ndmsg' is used by iproute2
> > as well (in the 'ip neigh
On 9/28/18 1:35 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> Currently, rtnl_fdb_dump() assumes the family header is 'struct ifinfomsg',
> which is not always true. For example, 'struct ndmsg' is used by iproute2
> as well (in the 'ip neigh' command).
>
> The problem is, the function bails out early i
Currently, rtnl_fdb_dump() assumes the family header is 'struct ifinfomsg',
which is not always true. For example, 'struct ndmsg' is used by iproute2
as well (in the 'ip neigh' command).
The problem is, the function bails out early if nlmsg_parse() fails, which
does occur for iproute2 usage of 's
11 matches
Mail list logo
