On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:08:15PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
xt_counter being
From: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:10:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:43:26AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:10:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same
Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot add __align(16) on
the structure
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot add __align(16) on
the structure itself.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
