On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:52:11PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 17/06/2015 21:10, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> >On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >>Le 15/06/2015 18:33, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> >>>This series adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track w
Le 17/06/2015 21:10, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 15/06/2015 18:33, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
This series adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 15/06/2015 18:33, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> >This series adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> >not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> >interface associated with the next-
Le 15/06/2015 18:33, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
This series adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
interface associated with the next-hop.
Before this patch any link-failure on an interface that was serving
This series adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
interface associated with the next-hop.
Before this patch any link-failure on an interface that was serving as a
gateway for some systems could result in tho
