On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 11:35:03 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 09.07.2016 11:18, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:04:27 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
> > wrote:
> I really do wonder if GRO on top of fragmentation
On 09.07.2016 11:18, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:04:27 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
I really do wonder if GRO on top of fragmentation does have any effect.
Would be great if someone has data for that already?
>>>
>>> I think that
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:04:27 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> >> I really do wonder if GRO on top of fragmentation does have any effect.
> >> Would be great if someone has data for that already?
> >
> > I think that logic is kind of backwards. It is already
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 08.07.2016 18:11, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> On 08.07.2016 17:27, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8,
On 08.07.2016 18:11, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 08.07.2016 17:27, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>>> wrote:
On
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 08.07.2016 17:27, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul
On 08.07.2016 17:19, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:57:10 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
>>> wrote:
I get that
On 08.07.2016 17:27, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Paolo Abeni
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:57:10 -0400 Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
> > wrote:
> >> I get that there is an impression that it is redundant but
On 08.07.2016 16:17, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> With udp tunnel offload in place, the kernel can do GRO for some udp tunnels
>>> at
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:21:40 -0700 Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > With udp tunnel offload in place, the kernel can do GRO for some udp tunnels
> > at the ingress device level. Currently both the geneve
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> With udp tunnel offload in place, the kernel can do GRO for some udp tunnels
> at the ingress device level. Currently both the geneve and the vxlan drivers
> implement an additional GRO aggregation point via gro_cells.
> The
With udp tunnel offload in place, the kernel can do GRO for some udp tunnels
at the ingress device level. Currently both the geneve and the vxlan drivers
implement an additional GRO aggregation point via gro_cells.
The latter takes effect for tunnels using zero checksum udp packets, which are
14 matches
Mail list logo