From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:41:35 -0700
> HTB, CBQ and HFSC pay a very high cost updating the qdisc 'throttled'
> status that nothing but CBQ seems to use.
>
> CBQ usage is flaky anyway, since no qdisc ->enqueue() updates the
> 'throttled' qdisc status.
>
HTB, CBQ and HFSC pay a very high cost updating the qdisc 'throttled'
status that nothing but CBQ seems to use.
CBQ usage is flaky anyway, since no qdisc ->enqueue() updates the
'throttled' qdisc status.
This looks like some 'optimization' that actually cost more than code
without the