Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] vrf: allow simultaneous service instances in default and other VRFs

2018-09-21 Thread David Miller
From: David Ahern Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:28:43 -0700 > I need some time to review and more importantly test this patch set > before it is committed. I am traveling tomorrow afternoon through Sunday > evening, so I need a few days into next week to get to this. Sure, no problem.

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] vrf: allow simultaneous service instances in default and other VRFs

2018-09-20 Thread David Ahern
On 9/20/18 1:58 AM, Mike Manning wrote: > Services currently have to be VRF-aware if they are using an unbound > socket. One cannot have multiple service instances running in the > default and other VRFs for services that are not VRF-aware and listen > on an unbound socket. This is because there

[PATCH net-next 0/5] vrf: allow simultaneous service instances in default and other VRFs

2018-09-20 Thread Mike Manning
Services currently have to be VRF-aware if they are using an unbound socket. One cannot have multiple service instances running in the default and other VRFs for services that are not VRF-aware and listen on an unbound socket. This is because there is no way of isolating packets received in the