Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

2018-07-02 Thread David Ahern
On 5/22/18 2:44 PM, David Ahern wrote: > On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >> Ok, I'll apply this series. >> >> But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately >> going to have to revert no matter how silly the current behavior may be. >> > > Understood. I

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

2018-05-29 Thread Thomas Winter
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote: > > Ok, I'll apply this series. > > But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately > going to have to revert no matter how si

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

2018-05-22 Thread David Ahern
On 5/22/18 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote: > > Ok, I'll apply this series. > > But if this breaks things for anyone in a practical way, I am unfortunately > going to have to revert no matter how silly the current behavior may be. > Understood. I have to try the best option first. I'll look at

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

2018-05-22 Thread David Miller
From: dsah...@kernel.org Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:26:51 -0700 > This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 > and adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and > replace are expected to work. In paricular it allows a multipath > route to have a dev-only

[PATCH net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

2018-05-21 Thread dsahern
From: David Ahern This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 and adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and replace are expected to work. In paricular it allows a multipath route to have a dev-only nexthop, something Thomas tried to