Re: [PATCH net-next 08/18] net: mvpp2: make the phy optional

2017-07-27 Thread Antoine Tenart
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:20:00PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > SFP ports do not necessarily need to have an Ethernet PHY between the > > SoC and the actual physical port. However, the driver currently makes > > the

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/18] net: mvpp2: make the phy optional

2017-07-26 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > SFP ports do not necessarily need to have an Ethernet PHY between the > SoC and the actual physical port. However, the driver currently makes > the "phy" property mandatory, contrary to what is stated in the Device > Tree binding. >

[PATCH net-next 08/18] net: mvpp2: make the phy optional

2017-07-24 Thread Antoine Tenart
SFP ports do not necessarily need to have an Ethernet PHY between the SoC and the actual physical port. However, the driver currently makes the "phy" property mandatory, contrary to what is stated in the Device Tree binding. To allow handling the PPv2 controller on those boards, this patch makes