When VFs are created, the current code subtracts the maximum VF
resources from the PF's pool. This under-estimates the resources
remaining in the PF pool. Instead, we should subtract the minimum
VF resources. The VF minimum resources are guaranteed to the VFs
and only these should be subtracted from the PF's pool.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.c...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
index a3d368e..4fa4761 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
@@ -510,18 +510,16 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp,
int num_vfs)
}
mutex_unlock(&bp->hwrm_cmd_lock);
if (pf->active_vfs) {
- u16 n = 1;
+ u16 n = pf->active_vfs;
- if (pf->vf_resv_strategy != BNXT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MINIMAL)
- n = pf->active_vfs;
-
- hw_resc->max_tx_rings -= vf_tx_rings * n;
- hw_resc->max_rx_rings -= vf_rx_rings * n;
- hw_resc->max_hw_ring_grps -= vf_ring_grps * n;
- hw_resc->max_cp_rings -= vf_cp_rings * n;
+ hw_resc->max_tx_rings -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_tx_rings) * n;
+ hw_resc->max_rx_rings -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_rx_rings) * n;
+ hw_resc->max_hw_ring_grps -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_hw_ring_grps) *
+ n;
+ hw_resc->max_cp_rings -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_cmpl_rings) * n;
hw_resc->max_rsscos_ctxs -= pf->active_vfs;
- hw_resc->max_stat_ctxs -= vf_stat_ctx * n;
- hw_resc->max_vnics -= vf_vnics * n;
+ hw_resc->max_stat_ctxs -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_stat_ctx) * n;
+ hw_resc->max_vnics -= le16_to_cpu(req.min_vnics) * n;
rc = pf->active_vfs;
}
--
1.8.3.1
