From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com>
It's pointless to panic on cache create failure when that case is handled
and even more so since it's not a kernel-wide fatal problem so don't
panic.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/vrf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index 4aa06450fafa..01dc91562a88 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int __init vrf_init_module(void)
vrf_dst_ops.kmem_cachep =
kmem_cache_create("vrf_ip_dst_cache",
sizeof(struct rtable), 0,
- SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC,
+ SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
NULL);
if (!vrf_dst_ops.kmem_cachep)
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
