Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-11-02 Thread roopa
On 11/1/15, 9:08 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > roopa writes: > >> On 11/1/15, 1:27 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Roopa Prabhu writes: >>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c index c70d750..7db9678 100644 --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >>

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-11-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
roopa writes: > On 11/1/15, 1:27 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Roopa Prabhu writes: >> >>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >>> index c70d750..7db9678 100644 >>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ >>> */ >>> #define MAX_MP_SELECT_

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-11-01 Thread roopa
On 11/1/15, 1:27 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Roopa Prabhu writes: > >> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >> index c70d750..7db9678 100644 >> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ >> */ >> #define MAX_MP_SELECT_LABELS 4 >> >> +u32 mpls_

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-11-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Roopa Prabhu writes: > diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c > index c70d750..7db9678 100644 > --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c > +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > */ > #define MAX_MP_SELECT_LABELS 4 > > +u32 mpls_multipath_secret __read_mostly; This mpls_multipath_secre

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-11-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Robert Shearman writes: > On 29/10/15 18:46, roopa wrote: >> On 10/29/15, 9:53 AM, Robert Shearman wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 15:49, Roopa Prabhu wrote: From: Roopa Prabhu Adds support for both RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags. This resembles ipv4 fib code. I also picked fib

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-10-30 Thread Robert Shearman
On 29/10/15 18:46, roopa wrote: On 10/29/15, 9:53 AM, Robert Shearman wrote: On 29/10/15 15:49, Roopa Prabhu wrote: From: Roopa Prabhu Adds support for both RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags. This resembles ipv4 fib code. I also picked fib_rebalance from ipv4. Enabled weights support for

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-10-29 Thread roopa
On 10/29/15, 9:53 AM, Robert Shearman wrote: > On 29/10/15 15:49, Roopa Prabhu wrote: >> From: Roopa Prabhu >> >> Adds support for both RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags. >> This resembles ipv4 fib code. I also picked fib_rebalance from >> ipv4. Enabled weights support for nexthop, just becaus

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-10-29 Thread Robert Shearman
On 29/10/15 15:49, Roopa Prabhu wrote: From: Roopa Prabhu Adds support for both RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags. This resembles ipv4 fib code. I also picked fib_rebalance from ipv4. Enabled weights support for nexthop, just because the infrastructure is already there. Signed-off-by: Roop

[PATCH net-next RFC] mpls: support for dead routes

2015-10-29 Thread Roopa Prabhu
From: Roopa Prabhu Adds support for both RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags. This resembles ipv4 fib code. I also picked fib_rebalance from ipv4. Enabled weights support for nexthop, just because the infrastructure is already there. Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu --- I want to get this in befor