Re: [PATCH net-next resubmit 1/2] net: phy: core: remove now uneeded disabling of interrupts

2017-12-04 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 4 December 2017 at 15:50, David Miller wrote: > From: Ard Biesheuvel > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:46:55 + > >> On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Heiner Kallweit >>> Date:

Re: [PATCH net-next resubmit 1/2] net: phy: core: remove now uneeded disabling of interrupts

2017-12-04 Thread David Miller
From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:46:55 + > On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote: >> From: Heiner Kallweit >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100 >> >>> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use

Re: [PATCH net-next resubmit 1/2] net: phy: core: remove now uneeded disabling of interrupts

2017-12-04 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiner Kallweit > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100 > >> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from >> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded

Re: [PATCH net-next resubmit 1/2] net: phy: core: remove now uneeded disabling of interrupts

2017-12-04 Thread David Miller
From: Heiner Kallweit Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100 > After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from > sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow > some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process

[PATCH net-next resubmit 1/2] net: phy: core: remove now uneeded disabling of interrupts

2017-11-30 Thread Heiner Kallweit
After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process context anyway and I don't think we need the disabling of interrupts any longer.