Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:50:04PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>> >> I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to expose
>> >> your hw state?
>> >
>> >We took
Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:57:54PM CEST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote:
>Hi David, Jiri,
>
>Jiri Pirko writes:
>
>> Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:38:37AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>>From: Vivien Didelot
>>>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:19:08PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 12:05 PM, Arkadi Sharshevsky wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/29/2017 03:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>> Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch
On 08/29/2017 12:05 PM, Arkadi Sharshevsky wrote:
>
>
> On 08/29/2017 03:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
> I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to
On 08/29/2017 03:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to expose
your hw state?
>>>
>>> We took a look at dpipe
Hi David, Jiri,
Jiri Pirko writes:
> Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:38:37AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>From: Vivien Didelot
>>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:17:38 -0400
>>
>>> This patch series adds a generic debugfs interface for the DSA
>>>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
> >> I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to expose
> >> your hw state?
> >
> >We took a look at dpipe and i talked to you about using it for this
>
Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:38:37AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Vivien Didelot
>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:17:38 -0400
>
>> This patch series adds a generic debugfs interface for the DSA
>> framework, so that all switch devices benefit from it, e.g.
Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:08:34PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>> I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to expose
>> your hw state?
>
>We took a look at dpipe and i talked to you about using it for this
>sort of thing at netconf/netdev. But dpipe has issues displaying the
>sort
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:17:38 -0400
> This patch series adds a generic debugfs interface for the DSA
> framework, so that all switch devices benefit from it, e.g. Marvell,
> Broadcom, Microchip or any other DSA driver.
I've been
> I see this overlaps a lot with DPIPE. Why won't you use that to expose
> your hw state?
We took a look at dpipe and i talked to you about using it for this
sort of thing at netconf/netdev. But dpipe has issues displaying the
sort of information we have. I never figured out how to do two
Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:17:38PM CEST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote:
>This patch series adds a generic debugfs interface for the DSA
>framework, so that all switch devices benefit from it, e.g. Marvell,
>Broadcom, Microchip or any other DSA driver.
>
>This is really convenient for
This patch series adds a generic debugfs interface for the DSA
framework, so that all switch devices benefit from it, e.g. Marvell,
Broadcom, Microchip or any other DSA driver.
This is really convenient for debugging, especially CPU ports and DSA
links which are not exposed to userspace as net
13 matches
Mail list logo