On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> What do you want the commit message to say? It shows an example because
> the functionality broke.
I expect it to explain why we need to increase that refcnt for GET
and how we missed it. Also need to find a right
On 16-09-08 01:12 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
+}
+
static int
tca_action_gd(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, struct nlmsghdr *n,
u32 portid, int event)
@@ -883,6 +894,7 @@ tca_action_gd(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, struct
nlmsghdr *n,
goto err;
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
>
> Example of what broke:
> ...add a gact action to drop
> sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
> ...now retrieve it, looks good
> sudo $TC actions get action gact index
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Example of what broke:
...add a gact action to drop
sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
...now retrieve it, looks good
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
...retrieve it again and find it is gone!
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10