Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] r8152: fix scheduling napi

From: Hayes Wang Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:04:45 + > May you apply these patches first, until I find another way to replace > current one? Yes, I will.

RE: [PATCH net v2 0/4] r8152: fix scheduling napi

David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:31 AM [...] > I think the fundamental issue is that since you can't stop URBs from > queueing up, you cannot properly synchronize NAPI and schedule polling > properly. > > From my perspective what happened here is you

Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] r8152: fix scheduling napi

From: Hayes Wang Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:13:17 +0800 > v2: > Add smp_mb__after_atomic() for patch #1. > > v1: > Scheduling the napi during the following periods would let it be ignored. > And the events wouldn't be handled until next napi_schedule() is called. > > 1.

[PATCH net v2 0/4] r8152: fix scheduling napi

v2: Add smp_mb__after_atomic() for patch #1. v1: Scheduling the napi during the following periods would let it be ignored. And the events wouldn't be handled until next napi_schedule() is called. 1. after napi_disable and before napi_enable(). 2. after all actions of napi function is completed