We cannot reliable calculate packet size on MSG_MORE corked sockets
and thus cannot decide if they are going to be fragmented later on,
so better not use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in the first place.
The IPv6 code also intended to protect and not use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in
the existence of IPv6 extension
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> We cannot reliable calculate packet size on MSG_MORE corked sockets
> and thus cannot decide if they are going to be fragmented later on,
> so better not use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in the first place.
>
> The
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 17:36, Tom Herbert
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 17:36, Tom Herbert wrote:> > - if
> (cork->length + length > maxnonfragsize - headersize) {
>> > + if (cork->length + length > maxnonfragsize - headersize) {
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 17:36, Tom Herbert wrote:> > - if
> > (cork->length + length > maxnonfragsize - headersize) {
> >> > +
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 17:36, Tom Herbert wrote:> > - if
(cork->length + length > maxnonfragsize - headersize) {
> > + if (cork->length + length > maxnonfragsize - headersize) {
> > emsgsize:
> > - ipv6_local_error(sk, EMSGSIZE, fl6,
> > -
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 19:37, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> >>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 20:19, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 19:37, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> >
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 20:19, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 19:37, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Oct
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 23:03, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>> > I posted v3 just now. I would like to let David
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 23:03, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
> > I posted v3 just now. I would like to let David consider it for net
> > inclusion. We can work on how to lift this limitation then in net-next,
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo