On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:06 AM, wrote:
> From: Gao Feng
>
> It is valid that the TCP RST packet which does not set ack flag, and bytes
> of ack number are zero. For these RST packets, seqadj could not adjust the
> ack number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng
> ---
> v2: Regenerate because the firs
From: Gao Feng
It is valid that the TCP RST packet which does not set ack flag, and bytes
of ack number are zero. For these RST packets, seqadj could not adjust the
ack number.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng
---
v2: Regenerate because the first patch is removed
v1: Initial patch
net/netfilter/nf_c
