Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:59:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:57:14 -0400 Series Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com I don't like this at all. I know it's a pain in the ass to have this dependency on SCTP, but

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

From: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:57:14 -0400 Series Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com I don't like this at all. I know it's a pain in the ass to have this dependency on SCTP, but calling exported functions is absolutely the right way to handle this

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:13:23PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and this call only is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we

[PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and this call only is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we have basically 3 options: - Doing a module split on dlm - which I'm avoiding