Hi Gregory,
On 08/03/17 06:10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On jeu., févr. 16 2017, Chris Packham
> wrote:
>
>> Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent
>> Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd
>> been wanting. It was still b
Hi Chris,
On jeu., févr. 16 2017, Chris Packham
wrote:
> Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent
> Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd
> been wanting. It was still based on an older kernel but it was a huge
> improvement over what
Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent
Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd
been wanting. It was still based on an older kernel but it was a huge
improvement over what came before.
Patch 1/6 is a typo I noticed after my initial series
Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent
Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd
been wanting. It was still based on an older kernel but it was a huge
improvement over what came before.
Patch 1/6 is a typo I noticed after my initial series
