On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 22:57 -0800, Felix Manlunas wrote:
> Tom Herbert wrote on Tue [2017-Feb-21 15:27:54 -0800]:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas
> > wrote:
> > > From: VSR Burru
> > >
> > > Improve UDP TX performance by:
> > > * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512
> >
> >
Tom Herbert wrote on Tue [2017-Feb-21 15:27:54 -0800]:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas
> wrote:
> > From: VSR Burru
> >
> > Improve UDP TX performance by:
> > * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512
>
> It looks like liquidio supports BQL. Is that not effective here?
Response
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas
wrote:
> From: VSR Burru
>
> Improve UDP TX performance by:
> * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512
It looks like liquidio supports BQL. Is that not effective here?
Thanks,
Tom
> * replacing the numerous streaming DMA allocations for info buffe
On 02/21/2017 01:09 PM, Felix Manlunas wrote:
From: VSR Burru
Improve UDP TX performance by:
* reducing the ring size from 2K to 512
* replacing the numerous streaming DMA allocations for info buffers and
gather lists with one large consistent DMA allocation per ring
Netperf benchmark number
From: VSR Burru
Improve UDP TX performance by:
* reducing the ring size from 2K to 512
* replacing the numerous streaming DMA allocations for info buffers and
gather lists with one large consistent DMA allocation per ring
Netperf benchmark numbers before and after patch:
PF UDP TX
++-