Hi,
Sorry for digging up an old patch, but... ;-)
dev_disable_lro() is a leftover from ancient times. If you read commit
27660515a,
there is a hint where it should go. Please, read on if you'd like to
fix this properly.
2015-11-03 3:55 GMT+01:00 Jarod Wilson :
> There are some
On 11/03/2015 03:55 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
[snip]
>
> +#define for_each_netdev_feature(mask_addr, feature)
> \
> + int bit;
> \
> + for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)mask_addr,
On 11/03/2015 02:57 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2015 03:55 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> [snip]
+#define for_each_netdev_feature(mask_addr, feature)
Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 11/03/2015 02:57 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
On 11/03/2015 03:55 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
[snip]
+#define for_each_netdev_feature(mask_addr, feature)
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 03:55 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> +#define for_each_netdev_feature(mask_addr, feature)
>> \
>> + int bit;
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
On 11/03/2015 03:55 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
[snip]
+#define for_each_netdev_feature(mask_addr, feature) \
+ int bit;
From: Jarod Wilson
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:55:59 -0500
> There are some netdev features, which when disabled on an upper device,
> such as a bonding master or a bridge, must be disabled and cannot be
> re-enabled on underlying devices.
>
> This is a rework of an earlier more
There are some netdev features, which when disabled on an upper device,
such as a bonding master or a bridge, must be disabled and cannot be
re-enabled on underlying devices.
This is a rework of an earlier more heavy-handed appraoch, which simply
disables and prevents re-enabling of netdev