Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: sk_buff rbnode reorg

2017-09-19 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:14:24 -0700 > From: Eric Dumazet > > skb->rbnode shares space with skb->next, skb->prev and skb->tstamp > > Current uses (TCP receive ofo queue and netem) need to save/restore > tstamp, while skb->dev is

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: sk_buff rbnode reorg

2017-09-19 Thread Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > skb->rbnode shares space with skb->next, skb->prev and skb->tstamp > > Current uses (TCP receive ofo queue and netem) need to save/restore > tstamp, while skb->dev is either

[PATCH v2 net-next] net: sk_buff rbnode reorg

2017-09-19 Thread Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet skb->rbnode shares space with skb->next, skb->prev and skb->tstamp Current uses (TCP receive ofo queue and netem) need to save/restore tstamp, while skb->dev is either NULL (TCP) or a constant for a given queue (netem). Since we plan using an RB tree