On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:31:42AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mo,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:36:38AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:08:05PM -0300, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
netns_sctp-addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(). With this, we can
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
That's needed for the next patch,
On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 11:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015,
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
netns_sctp-addr_wq_lock and
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:46, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
a few hints on rcuification, sorry I reviewed the code so late:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 19:08, mleit...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marcelo
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
netns_sctp-addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(). With this, we can traverse addr_waitq
without taking addr_wq_lock, taking it just for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
