From: Joe Stringer
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:08:18 -0700
> If OVS receives a packet from another namespace, then the packet should
> be scrubbed. However, people have already begun to rely on the behaviour
> that skb->mark is preserved across namespaces, so retain this one field.
>
> This is mai
On 10/16/15 at 11:08am, Joe Stringer wrote:
> If OVS receives a packet from another namespace, then the packet should
> be scrubbed. However, people have already begun to rely on the behaviour
> that skb->mark is preserved across namespaces, so retain this one field.
>
> This is mainly to address
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> If OVS receives a packet from another namespace, then the packet should
> be scrubbed. However, people have already begun to rely on the behaviour
> that skb->mark is preserved across namespaces, so retain this one field.
>
> This is mainly t
If OVS receives a packet from another namespace, then the packet should
be scrubbed. However, people have already begun to rely on the behaviour
that skb->mark is preserved across namespaces, so retain this one field.
This is mainly to address information leakage between namespaces when
using OVS
