On 2016-06-12 20:30, subas...@codeaurora.org wrote:
The suggested change would extend the usable range of positive numbers
by one bit only. As many systems are 64 bit this does not seem forward
looking.
I would prefer to have a routine that can handle 64 bit integers with
limits (let's call it
The suggested change would extend the usable range of positive numbers
by one bit only. As many systems are 64 bit this does not seem forward
looking.
I would prefer to have a routine that can handle 64 bit integers with
limits (let's call it proc_doint64vec_minmax) which uses fields extra1
and
On 06/10/2016 04:40 AM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> We have scripts which write to certain fields on 3.18 kernels but
> this seems to be failing on 4.4 kernels.
> An entry which we write to here is xfrm_aevent_rseqth which is u32.
>
> echo 4294967295 >
On 06/10/2016 04:40 AM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> We have scripts which write to certain fields on 3.18 kernels but
> this seems to be failing on 4.4 kernels.
> An entry which we write to here is xfrm_aevent_rseqth which is u32.
>
> echo 4294967295 >
We have scripts which write to certain fields on 3.18 kernels but
this seems to be failing on 4.4 kernels.
An entry which we write to here is xfrm_aevent_rseqth which is u32.
echo 4294967295 > /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
Commit 230633d109e35b0a24277498e773edeb79b4a331
