Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-02-01 Thread John Heffner
On Monday 30 January 2006 20:21, Ian McDonald wrote: > On 1/31/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 > > > > > I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give > > > it a try. One r

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-02-01 Thread John Heffner
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 01:12, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > 1) Get rid of the debugging printk()'s > > I would suggest to replace them with statistic counters for netstat -s I just tried adding a few linux-mib entries for this, and netstat started dying. There is a hard-coded limit of 1024 in nets

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-01-30 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 01:09, John Heffner wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 > > > >>I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give > >>it a try. One remaining item to consider is how be

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-01-30 Thread Ian McDonald
On 1/31/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 > > > I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give > > it a try. One remaining item to consider is how best to cache the state > > betw

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-01-30 Thread John Heffner
David S. Miller wrote: From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give it a try. One remaining item to consider is how best to cache the state between connections. Are there any major concer

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2006-01-30 Thread David S. Miller
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 > I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give > it a try. One remaining item to consider is how best to cache the state > between connections. Are there any major concerns or reservations a

Re: [RFC] TCP MTU probing

2005-12-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0500 > I'd like to get a few people at least to look this over, and maybe give > it a try. One remaining item to consider is how best to cache the state > between connections. Are there any major concerns or reservations a

[RFC] TCP MTU probing

2005-12-06 Thread John Heffner
(aka. Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery) The patch can be found at: This is based on work by the IETF pmtud wg to make PMTUD work correctly in the absence of correct ICMP delivery. The currently published internet-draft is at: