Re: [RFC] make kmemleak scan __ro_after_init section (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] genetlink improvements)

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:47:55PM +, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > I realized that kmemleak is not scanning the __ro_after_init section... > Following patch solves the false positives but I wonder if it's the > right/acceptable solution. Thanks for putting this together. I actually hit a similar

Re: [RFC] make kmemleak scan __ro_after_init section (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] genetlink improvements)

Hi, Sorry for not chipping in earlier - LPC is taking my time. > > > > Looks like we are missing a kfree(family->attrbuf); on error > > > > path, but it is not related to Johannes' recent patches. Actually, I think it *is* related to my patch - I inserted the code there in the wrong place or

Re: [RFC] make kmemleak scan __ro_after_init section (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] genetlink improvements)

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Thanks for looking into this! Bisect led me to the following commit: > > commit 56989f6d8568c21257dcec0f5e644d5570ba3281 > Author: Johannes Berg > Date: Mon Oct 24 14:40:05 2016 +0200 > >

[RFC] make kmemleak scan __ro_after_init section (was: Re: [PATCH 0/5] genetlink improvements)

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:30:34 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:32:52 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >> > unreferenced object