Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:40:26AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On 17-06-2015 10:16, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:40:32AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>On 17-06-2015 09:20, Neil Horman wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:38:10AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo L

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On 17-06-2015 10:16, Neil Horman wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:40:32AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: On 17-06-2015 09:20, Neil Horman wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:38:10AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: On 17-06-2015 07:21, Neil Horman wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:40:32AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On 17-06-2015 09:20, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:38:10AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>On 17-06-2015 07:21, Neil Horman wrote: > >>>On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo L

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On 17-06-2015 09:20, Neil Horman wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:38:10AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: On 17-06-2015 07:21, Neil Horman wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:38:10AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On 17-06-2015 07:21, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. > >>Currently dlm code

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On 17-06-2015 07:21, Neil Horman wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and only this call is causing the load of sctp module

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. > Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and only this > call is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we

[RFC PATCH 0/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL

2015-06-16 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and only this call is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we have basically 3 options: - Doing a module split on dlm - which I'm avoiding beca