On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:48AM +, Joao Martins wrote:
[...]
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -168,8 +169,12 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *dev)
cb = XENVIF_RX_CB(skb);
cb-expires = jiffies + vif-drain_timeout;
-
On 19 May 2015, at 17:35, Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:30PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
By introducing persistent grants we speed up the RX thread with the
decreased copy cost, that leads to a throughput decrease of 20%.
It is observed that the rx_queue
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:30PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
By introducing persistent grants we speed up the RX thread with the
decreased copy cost, that leads to a throughput decrease of 20%.
It is observed that the rx_queue stays mostly at 10% of its capacity,
as opposed to full capacity
By introducing persistent grants we speed up the RX thread with the
decreased copy cost, that leads to a throughput decrease of 20%.
It is observed that the rx_queue stays mostly at 10% of its capacity,
as opposed to full capacity when using grant copy. And a finer measure
with lock_stat (below
