On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:05:36 +0200 (EET) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > vmlinux.o:
> > > 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It should be possible to use a modular jhash.ko. The things which you
> have identified as clients of the jhash library are usually loaded as modules.
For very small functions like this own modules are quite expensive. First
everything gets rounded
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > vmlinux.o:
> > 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869
> >
> > ...+ these to lib/jhash.o:
> > jhash_3words: 112
> > jhash2: 276
> >
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vmlinux.o:
> 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869
>
> ...+ these to lib/jhash.o:
> jhash_3words: 112
> jhash2: 276
> jhash: 475
>
> select for networking code might need a more
vmlinux.o:
62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869
...+ these to lib/jhash.o:
jhash_3words: 112
jhash2: 276
jhash: 475
select for networking code might need a more fine-grained approach.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/infiniband/
