On 23/02/18 22:27, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 09:41 AM, Edward Cree wrote:
>> Where the register umin_value is increasing sufficiently fast, the loop
>> will terminate after a reasonable number of iterations, so we can allow
>> to keep walking it.
> Continuing to walk the loop is
On 02/23/2018 09:41 AM, Edward Cree wrote:
> Where the register umin_value is increasing sufficiently fast, the loop
> will terminate after a reasonable number of iterations, so we can allow
> to keep walking it.
Continuing to walk the loop is problematic because we hit the complexity
limit.
Where the register umin_value is increasing sufficiently fast, the loop
will terminate after a reasonable number of iterations, so we can allow
to keep walking it.
The semantics of prev_insn_idx are changed slightly: it now always refers
to the last jump insn walked, even when that jump was not
