On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:03 AM, David Ahern d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
In the context of internet scale routing a requirement that always
comes up is the need to partition the available routing tables into
disjoint routing planes. A specific use case is the multi-tenancy
problem where
Le 06/07/2015 19:53, Shrijeet Mukherjee a écrit :
No no problem,
Just trying to get the functional aspects worked out. the global
search replace will be easy.
Was hoping to see some more responses on the naming suggestions here
from the community. If there is not disagreement we can spin
No no problem,
Just trying to get the functional aspects worked out. the global
search replace will be easy.
Was hoping to see some more responses on the naming suggestions here
from the community. If there is not disagreement we can spin patches
with MRF as the name.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at
In the context of internet scale routing a requirement that always
comes up is the need to partition the available routing tables into
disjoint routing planes. A specific use case is the multi-tenancy
problem where each tenant has their own unique routing tables and in
the very least need
Le 06/07/2015 17:03, David Ahern a écrit :
In the context of internet scale routing a requirement that always
comes up is the need to partition the available routing tables into
disjoint routing planes. A specific use case is the multi-tenancy
problem where each tenant has their own unique
