From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:39:22 -0700
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 23:10 +0900, David S. Miller wrote:
>> @@ -116,12 +116,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_alloc);
>>
>> struct dst_entry *dst_destroy(struct dst_entry * dst)
>> {
>> -struct dst_entry *child;
>> +struct dst_entry *c
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 23:10 +0900, David S. Miller wrote:
> Only IPSEC routes have a non-NULL dst->child pointer. And IPSEC
> routes are identified by a non-NULL dst->xfrm pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
> ---
> include/net/xfrm.h | 9 +
> net/core/dst.c
Only IPSEC routes have a non-NULL dst->child pointer. And IPSEC
routes are identified by a non-NULL dst->xfrm pointer.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 9 +
net/core/dst.c | 8 +---
net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/xfrm6
