el
>> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Jan Beulich; netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correct return value checks
>> on xenbus_scanf()
>>
>> On 07/07/16 11:35, Wei Liu wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:58:16A
e: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correct return value checks
> on xenbus_scanf()
>
> On 07/07/16 11:35, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:58:16AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Only a positive retu
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Durrant
> Sent: 07 July 2016 11:41
> To: Wei Liu; David Vrabel
> Cc: Jan Beulich; Wei Liu; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correct return value che
On 07/07/16 11:35, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:58:16AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Only a positive return value indicates success.
>>
>> This is not correct.
>>
>
> Do you mean the commit message is not correct or the code is not
>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correct return value checks
> on xenbus_scanf()
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:58:16AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > Only a positive return value indicates success.
> >
> > This
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:58:16AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Only a positive return value indicates success.
>
> This is not correct.
>
Do you mean the commit message is not correct or the code is not
correct? If it is the formal, do you have any
On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Only a positive return value indicates success.
This is not correct.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jan
> Beulich
> Sent: 07 July 2016 08:57
> To: Wei Liu
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correc
