Re: [iproute PATCH 2/8] tc: connmark, pedit: Rename BRANCH to CONTROL

2016-03-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:56:18 +0100 Phil Sutter wrote: > As Jamal suggested, BRANCH is the wrong name, as these keywords go > beyond simple branch control - e.g. loops are possible, too. Therefore > rename the non-terminal to CONTROL instead which should be more > appropriate. > >

[iproute PATCH 2/8] tc: connmark, pedit: Rename BRANCH to CONTROL

2016-03-20 Thread Phil Sutter
As Jamal suggested, BRANCH is the wrong name, as these keywords go beyond simple branch control - e.g. loops are possible, too. Therefore rename the non-terminal to CONTROL instead which should be more appropriate. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter --- man/man8/tc-connmark.8 | 6 +++---