Roland Dreier wrote:
The action in bonding to a detach of slave is to unregister the master
(see patch 10).
This can't be done from the context of unregister_netdevice itself (it is
protected by rtnl_lock).
I'm confused. Your patch has:
+ ipoib_slave_detach(cpriv-dev);
Roland Dreier wrote:
+ ipoib_slave_detach(cpriv-dev);
unregister_netdev(cpriv-dev);
Maybe you already answered this before, but I'm still not clear why
this notifier call can't just be added to the start of
unregister_netdevice(), so we can avoid having driver
The action in bonding to a detach of slave is to unregister the master (see
patch 10).
This can't be done from the context of unregister_netdevice itself (it is
protected by rtnl_lock).
I'm confused. Your patch has:
+ipoib_slave_detach(cpriv-dev);
