Re: [patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated

2006-03-08 Thread Ravikiran G Thirumalai
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:22:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is percpu_counter_sum has to read all the cpus cachelines. If we have to use percpu_counter_sum everywhere, then might as well use plain per-cpu counters instead of

[patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated

2006-03-07 Thread Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Change struct proto-memory_allocated to a batching per-CPU counter (percpu_counter) from an atomic_t. A batching counter is better than a plain per-CPU counter as this field is read often. Signed-off-by: Pravin B. Shelar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated

2006-03-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - if (atomic_read(sk-sk_prot-memory_allocated) sk-sk_prot-sysctl_mem[0]) { +if (percpu_counter_read(sk-sk_prot-memory_allocated) +sk-sk_prot-sysctl_mem[0]) { Bear in mind that percpu_counter_read[_positive] can

Re: [patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated

2006-03-07 Thread Ravikiran G Thirumalai
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:14:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - if (atomic_read(sk-sk_prot-memory_allocated) sk-sk_prot-sysctl_mem[0]) { + if (percpu_counter_read(sk-sk_prot-memory_allocated) +

Re: [patch 2/4] net: percpufy frequently used vars -- struct proto.memory_allocated

2006-03-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:14:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - if (atomic_read(sk-sk_prot-memory_allocated) sk-sk_prot-sysctl_mem[0]) { +if