Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:43:43AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>patch 3/3 I haven't looked at yet...I'm stuck on 2/3.
>>
>> It is very similar to 2/3, only for obj_add/del.
>
>Do we have examples of a deferred obj add or del? Maybe we should
>hold off adding that support until someon
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:39:41AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:03:35AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:39:41AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:03:35AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:27:07AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wr
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:03:35AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:27:07AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:03:35AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:27:07AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
From: Jiri Pirko
Caller should know if he can
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:27:07AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>>
>>> Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL)
>>> or if he has to use de
Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:27:07AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
>> Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL)
>> or if he has to use deferred version of this function.
>>
>> This also allows dri
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL)
> or if he has to use deferred version of this function.
>
> This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation
> status back to sw
Hi Jiri,
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master -- if it's inappropriate base, please
ignore]
config: i386-randconfig-x003-201540 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/bri
From: Jiri Pirko
Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL)
or if he has to use deferred version of this function.
This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation
status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is
not ok, ins
10 matches
Mail list logo