Any idea why 120Mhz is used instead of 133? It doesn't
seem to matter in my performance tests, but I am curious...
I think Rick is right, the bus between the bridge on the card and the
e1000s is running at 120Mhz.
- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
t
Auke Kok wrote:
obviously 120 is missing, but PCI-E speeds are also missing (2500gbps). The
output of the e1000 module is correct.
Any idea why 120Mhz is used instead of 133? It doesn't
seem to matter in my performance tests, but I am curious...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ben Greear wrote:
I'm running a slightly modified 2.6.16.13 kernel on FC5-amd64. The
motherboard
is SuperMicro H8SSL dual-core AMD system. According to super-micro web
site,
the PCI-X slot is 133Mhz. I'm using a 4-port pro/1000 NIC.
dmesg shows a listing of 120Mhz:
IIRC there is a bridge
Ben Greear wrote:
I'm running a slightly modified 2.6.16.13 kernel on FC5-amd64. The
motherboard
is SuperMicro H8SSL dual-core AMD system. According to super-micro web
site,
the PCI-X slot is 133Mhz. I'm using a 4-port pro/1000 NIC.
dmesg shows a listing of 120Mhz:
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Networ
I'm running a slightly modified 2.6.16.13 kernel on FC5-amd64. The motherboard
is SuperMicro H8SSL dual-core AMD system. According to super-micro web site,
the PCI-X slot is 133Mhz. I'm using a 4-port pro/1000 NIC.
dmesg shows a listing of 120Mhz:
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 6.