Adrian,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346
Submitter : Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status :
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
Adrian,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346
Submitter : Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner
Michal Piotrowski napisał(a):
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
Adrian,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346
Submitter : Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
Adrian,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346
Submitter : Michal
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
Adrian,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References :
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
