Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 hw csum failure problem References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown This is not a regression it is a bug, that has shown up for some users for quite a while, see:

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Håkan Lindqvist
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:30 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 hw csum failure problem References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown This is not a regression it is a bug, that has shown up

2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Subject: kernel crash at boot with maxcpus=1 on quad core kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1023

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions I went here, but without a login the page is immutable Therefore I'll add

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions I went

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:52:19PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions I

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Meyer
Michal Piotrowski schrieb: Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 Submitter : Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknow Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only problem and

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Diego Calleja
El Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:03:07 +0200, Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only problem and is not related to any kernel driver: amarok and/or audacious seems to repeatedly read/write to the X socket: OK - I added it

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, assignation of ttyUSB#'s is volatile depending on phase of the moon when booted. That's always been the case, ever since the 2.2 kernel releases. Please use udev if you want persistent device names for your tty USB devices. I don't know how udev (or

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:21:54PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, assignation of ttyUSB#'s is volatile depending on phase of the moon when booted. That's always been the case, ever since the 2.2 kernel releases. Please use udev if you want