2007/8/10, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> ===
> --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> @@ -735,7 +735,8 @@ void fastcall send_IPI_self(int vector
see below
> arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c |3 ++-
> arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic.c |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> ===
> --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/i
> Ingo: I think, you have to do this in x86_64, and there is probably
> send_IPI_mask used for this (but I can miss something...).
>
> I think, Marcin will not be able to do this and report before monday,
> but,
> Jean-Baptiste: of course current Ingo's or Thomas' patches are
> more urgent, so if
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo: I think, you have to do this in x86_64, and there is probably
> send_IPI_mask used for this (but I can miss something...).
indeed - full patch below.
Ingo
---
arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c |3 ++-
arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic.c |
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:33:53 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > + }
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> > >
> > > we used the hw-resend method unconditionally, right?
> >
> > Right: unconditionally o
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:33:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > + }
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> > >
> > > we used the hw-resend method unconditionally, right?
> >
> > Right: unconditionally on a condition
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > + }
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> >
> > we used the hw-resend method unconditionally, right?
>
> Right: unconditionally on a condition they are not edges...
>
> But, since not resending at all seems to work so goo
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:56:11AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
> this changes the picture completely and makes the IO-APIC/local-APIC hw
> retrigger code/logic the main suspect. I think you right that it's quite
> bogus to hw-retrigger level irqs, and that could be confusing the
> IO-APIC (or
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [...] Well, there are probably (but need more testing) two other
> > > solutions: _SW_RESEND and disabling without delay for levels
> > > only...
> >
> > IIRC Marcin tested software-resend and it didnt fix the hang. That
> > strongly points i
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:30:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hmm. This solution is still just pampering over the real problem.
> > > The delayed disable just re-sends level interrupts unnecessarily. I
> > > have a fix (needs some testing)
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm. This solution is still just pampering over the real problem.
> > The delayed disable just re-sends level interrupts unnecessarily. I
> > have a fix (needs some testing) for this, which I send out tomorrow,
> > when I'm really back from vaca
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:05:40AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:54 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm not sure I don't miss anything (a little in hurry now), but this
> > warning's aim was purely diagnostical and nothing wrong is meant!
> > Unless there is something w
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:54 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> I'm not sure I don't miss anything (a little in hurry now), but this
> warning's aim was purely diagnostical and nothing wrong is meant!
> Unless there is something wrong... Then please try to be more explicit.
>
> If you prefer to not se
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:03:03AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi, read below, please...
>
> I'm opening this ticket as a new subject, even though it looks like it
> might be related to the thread "Networking dies after random time".
> Sorry for the wide CC list, but since my network has
Hi,
I'm opening this ticket as a new subject, even though it looks like it
might be related to the thread "Networking dies after random time".
Sorry for the wide CC list, but since my network hasn't died since I
rebooted into 2.6.23-rc2 (after 30+ days at 2.6.22-rc7), I'm wondering
if the problem
Hi,
Just added an old network card, RTL-8029(AS), ne2k-pci driver, and tried to
expand the network (failed because I didn't use a cross-over cable).
The code snippet that spat the thing:
/*
* IRQ resend
*
* Is called with interrupts disabled and desc->lock held.
*/
void check_irq_resend(stru
16 matches
Mail list logo
