tcp_sacktag_one() WARNING (was Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1)

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
, but it isn't e1000. It's core TCP. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Ilpo, Reuben's kernel is talking to you ;) ...Please try the patch below. Andrew, this probably fixes your problem (the packets = tp

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ I got this one while compiling on NFS. C. kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote: I got this one while compiling on NFS. C. kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480! I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are not, with rc4-mm1 there are two patches (first one

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Ilpo Järvinen wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote: I got this one while compiling on NFS. C. kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480! I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are not, with rc4-mm1

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-12 Thread Cedric Le Goater
stops working, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change then - certainly looks networking related. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Call

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-12 Thread Cedric Le Goater
core TCP. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Ilpo, Reuben's kernel is talking to you ;) ...Please try the patch below. Andrew, this probably fixes your problem (the packets = tp-packets_out) as well. nah. I got

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 11/12/2007 8:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere: http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid for

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. Wouldn't it make sense to just default

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Kok, Auke wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. Wouldn't it make sense

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
kconfig setting as E1000, at least for -mm testing. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/Kconfig |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/net/Kconfig +++ linux-2.6.24-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/Kconfig @@ -1986,6 +1986,7 @@ config

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:17:01 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Changes since 2.6.24-rc3-mm2: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 brought a nice TCP oops on my x86_64 system, while I was stress-testing the VM and watching via ssh: general protection fault: [1] SMP last sysfs file: /sys/devices

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Ilpo, Reuben's kernel is talking to you ;) ...Please try the patch below. Andrew, this probably fixes your problem (the packets = tp-packets_out) as well. Dave, please include

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: Dave, please include this one to net-2.6.25. ... -- [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix fack_count miscountings (multiple places) I've better version of this coming up, so Dave please don't put this one into net-2.6.25 (noticed that both the original and the after

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6

tcp assertion failures in 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-09 Thread Andrew Morton
) [ cut here ] Badness at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 NIP: c03d46a4 LR: c03d4d84 CTR: c0408914 REGS: c00177b770e0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.24-rc4-mm1) MSR: 90029032 EE,ME,IR,DR CR: 24002488 XER: TASK = c00178868540[8316] 'cc1

Re: tcp assertion failures in 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-09 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
-packets_out) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2136) [ cut here ] Badness at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 NIP: c03d46a4 LR: c03d4d84 CTR: c0408914 REGS: c00177b770e0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.24-rc4-mm1) MSR: 90029032 EE,ME,IR,DR CR

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-07 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change then - certainly looks networking related. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Call

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread David Miller
fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change then - certainly looks networking related. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2518 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 #1 Call Trace: IRQ [8046e038] tcp_fastretrans_alert+0x229

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24