On 10/27/2015 01:55 PM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi Nikolay
>
> But based on this output i think they are part of same aggregator.
> cat /sys/class/net/bond/bonding/slaves
> eth2 eth1
> I am adding slave ports via ifenslave bond eth1 eth2
>
Hi again,
Please don't top post. You've shown that
Hi Nikolay
But based on this output i think they are part of same aggregator.
cat /sys/class/net/bond/bonding/slaves
eth2 eth1
I am adding slave ports via ifenslave bond eth1 eth2
Each individual slave port seems to be getting a different aggr id. I
confirmed this by adding an additional port
On 10/27/2015 02:16 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 01:55 PM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>> Hi Nikolay
>>
>> But based on this output i think they are part of same aggregator.
>> cat /sys/class/net/bond/bonding/slaves
>> eth2 eth1
>> I am adding slave ports via ifenslave bond eth1 eth2
>>
On 10/27/2015 01:17 PM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have configured a bond with 2 slave bond ports in 802.3 ad mode.
> I have also set min-links=2 and miimon=100
>
>
> root@foo bonding]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
>
> Bonding Mode:
Hi
I have configured a bond with 2 slave bond ports in 802.3 ad mode.
I have also set min-links=2 and miimon=100
root@foo bonding]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy:
