Thank you for the pointer, I am looking at the patch ad
see if it help. In my case, that will do the trick, but as mentioned
by Dave it may not have its place in a general distro.
Perso I would rather cloning -- do not flame me, it is not my intent to
Chris Leech wrote:
Just to give you an idea of our motivation around this, we're looking
at layer 2 configuration protocols implemented from user space.
I'd like to second the intent of this patch. We've been maintaining a
patch against 2.6.10 for a while now that exports the original
When using PF_PACKET socket with bonded interfaces, there is no
way to get the slave interface (physical interface) the packet was
actually received on.
It looks like there isn't a way to pass the original device {see
packet_rcv() in ./net/packet/af_packet.c} to the socket reader.
When an
From: Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:05:27 -0700
When using PF_PACKET socket with bonded interfaces, there is no
way to get the slave interface (physical interface) the packet was
actually received on.
That's right.
There isn't a real good solution to this problem
On 4/18/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, it will give you one level of decapsulation.
What do we tell people who want 2 devices previous? :-)
I can tell you that the intent of PJs patch was to provide the ifindex
of the physical interface that a packet entered the system on,
From: Chris Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:17:45 -0700
On 4/18/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, it will give you one level of decapsulation.
What do we tell people who want 2 devices previous? :-)
I can tell you that the intent of PJs patch was to provide
On 4/18/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll try to remember to high-priority reviewing PJ's patch
on my next rebase of the net-2.6.22 tree which should be
tonight or tomorrow sometime.
Thanks Dave, PJ is offline this week so I'm trying to keep an eye out
for discussions related
