On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Why don't you accept it now and allow us the time to work on this in the
coming period? The driver works, performs better than all 8257x hardware
and uses less CPU utilization. That must be good for everyone. Keeping it
outside of
Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 09:33 schrieben Sie:
Well, these useless abstractions are really annoying and nothing we allow
into other drivers either.
However, they make it easier for multiple developers to work as a team. This
is useful for development pace and makes maintainance less dependant
Kok, Auke wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch [558K]
http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch.bz2 [98K]
Just took a look at this.
This has the same problem as in the other thread -- huge internal API
-- except this time, the
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch [558K]
http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch.bz2 [98K]
Just took a look at this.
This has the same problem as in the other thread -- huge internal API --
except this time, the problem is
Kok, Auke wrote:
All,
We are pleased to announce a new Gigabit Ethernet product and its driver
to the
linux community. This product is the Intel(R) 82575 Gigabit Ethernet
adapter
family. Physical adapters will be available to the public soon. These
adapters
come in 2- and 4-port versions
All,
We are pleased to announce a new Gigabit Ethernet product and its driver to the
linux community. This product is the Intel(R) 82575 Gigabit Ethernet adapter
family. Physical adapters will be available to the public soon. These adapters
come in 2- and 4-port versions (copper PHY)
