Dear David,
On 2017-06-02 20:37, David Miller wrote:
From: Cong Wang
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:51:39 -0700
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
On 06/01/17 18:19, David Miller wrote:
Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We
only
manage stable b
From: Cong Wang
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:51:39 -0700
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Dear David,
>>
>>
>> On 06/01/17 18:19, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We only
>>> manage stable backport submissions for the
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear David,
>
>
> On 06/01/17 18:19, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We only
>> manage stable backport submissions for the most recent two releases.
>
>
> Thank you for the prompt respon
Dear David,
On 06/01/17 18:19, David Miller wrote:
Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We only
manage stable backport submissions for the most recent two releases.
Thank you for the prompt response. Should the netdev FAQ be updated then
to contain that information
Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We only
manage stable backport submissions for the most recent two releases.
Dear David, dear Eric,
We noticed, that we manually apply commit 52bd2d62ce67 (net: better
skb->sender_cpu and skb->napi_id cohabitation), present since v4.5-rc1,
to our Linux 4.4 images.
Would it be useful to have it included in the 4.4 series?
Kind regards,
Paul
