On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 10:58 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 20:35 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>
> > Overlimits never appear in HTB as i know, here is simulation on this
> > class that have constant "at least" 1G traffic, i throttled it to 1Kbit
> > to simulate forced
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 20:35 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Overlimits never appear in HTB as i know, here is simulation on this
> class that have constant "at least" 1G traffic, i throttled it to 1Kbit
> to simulate forced drops:
>
> shapernew ~ # sh /etc/shaper.cfg;sleep 1;tc -s -d
On 2017-09-13 20:20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 20:12 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
For my case, as load increased now, i am hitting same issue (i tried
to
play with quantum / bursts as well, didnt helped):
tc -s -d class show dev eth3.777 classid 1:111;sleep 5;tc -s -d
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 20:12 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> For my case, as load increased now, i am hitting same issue (i tried to
> play with quantum / bursts as well, didnt helped):
>
> tc -s -d class show dev eth3.777 classid 1:111;sleep 5;tc -s -d class
> show dev eth3.777 classid
On 2017-09-13 19:55, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:27 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On 2017-09-13 19:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:34 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >> Well, probably i am
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:27 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On 2017-09-13 19:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:34 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > >> Well, probably i am answering my own question, removing
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:27 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On 2017-09-13 19:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:34 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >> Well, probably i am answering my own question, removing estimator from
> >> classes seems drastically improve situation.
On 2017-09-13 19:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:34 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Well, probably i am answering my own question, removing estimator from
classes seems drastically improve situation.
It seems estimator has some issues that cause shaper to behave
incorrectly
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:34 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Well, probably i am answering my own question, removing estimator from
> classes seems drastically improve situation.
> It seems estimator has some issues that cause shaper to behave
> incorrectly (throttling traffic while it
On 2017-09-13 18:51, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:20 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Hi,
I noticed after increasing bandwidth over some amount HTB started to
throttle classes it should not throttle.
Also estimated rate in htb totally wrong, while byte counters is
correct.
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 18:20 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed after increasing bandwidth over some amount HTB started to
> throttle classes it should not throttle.
> Also estimated rate in htb totally wrong, while byte counters is
> correct.
>
> Is there any overflow or
Well, probably i am answering my own question, removing estimator from
classes seems drastically improve situation.
It seems estimator has some issues that cause shaper to behave
incorrectly (throttling traffic while it should not).
But i guess thats a bug?
As i was not able to predict such
Hi,
I noticed after increasing bandwidth over some amount HTB started to
throttle classes it should not throttle.
Also estimated rate in htb totally wrong, while byte counters is
correct.
Is there any overflow or something?
X520 card (but XL710 same)
br1 8000.90e2ba86c38c
13 matches
Mail list logo
