* Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. This is in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c tcp_v4_rcv with the
> bh_lock_sock_nested which I presume is clashing with the nested of
> skb_clone
yeah, that's exactly what happens.
> Can we not do two levels nested?
we can - but it needs to be thought th
On 6/22/06, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:34 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > As I read this it is not a recursive lock as sk_clone is occurring
> > > second and is actually creating a new socket so they ar
On 6/21/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone tell me whether I am correct in my thinking or not? If I
> > am then I will work out how to tell the lock validator not to worry
> > about it.
>
> I agree, this looks bogus. Ingo, could y
On 6/21/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:34 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > As I read this it is not a recursive lock as sk_clone is occurring
> > second and is actually creating a new socket so they are trying to
> > lock on different sockets.
> >
> > Can som
* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone tell me whether I am correct in my thinking or not? If I
> > am then I will work out how to tell the lock validator not to worry
> > about it.
>
> I agree, this looks bogus. Ingo, could you please take a look?
sure - Ian, could you try
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:34 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > As I read this it is not a recursive lock as sk_clone is occurring
> > second and is actually creating a new socket so they are trying to
> > lock on different sockets.
> >
> > Can someone tell me whether I am correct in my thinking or not?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:40:05PM +, Ian McDonald wrote:
>
> I am getting this when I am using DCCP with 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 with Ingo's
> lock dependency patch:
>
> Jun 21 09:38:58 localhost kernel: [ 102.068588]
> Jun 21 09:38:58 localhost kernel: [ 102.068592]
> =
Folks,
I am getting this when I am using DCCP with 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 with Ingo's
lock dependency patch:
Jun 21 09:38:58 localhost kernel: [ 102.068588]
Jun 21 09:38:58 localhost kernel: [ 102.068592]
=
Jun 21 09:38:58 localhost kernel: [ 102.068602] [
