Re: Possible regression due to "net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using egress Hardware device"

2016-12-03 Thread Simon Horman
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:06:08PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > in net-next I am observing what appears to be an regression in net-next due > > to: > > 7091d8c7055d ("net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using

Re: Possible regression due to "net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using egress Hardware device"

2016-12-03 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > in net-next I am observing what appears to be an regression in net-next due > to: > 7091d8c7055d ("net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using egress > Hardware device") > > The problem occurs when adding a flower

Possible regression due to "net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using egress Hardware device"

2016-12-03 Thread Simon Horman
Hi Hadar, in net-next I am observing what appears to be an regression in net-next due to: 7091d8c7055d ("net/sched: cls_flower: Add offload support using egress Hardware device") The problem occurs when adding a flower filter (without offload to a virtio device). # ethtool -d eth0 ethtool -i